[mdlug] Systemd Should Be A Fork -- Why Is It Not?

[Garry Stahl]

On 09/01/2015 10:03 AM, A. Zimmer wrote:

> I don't give a rat's a$$ about servers and system administration.
> I only care about the productivity that I can achieve on my personal
> desktop workstation and I do not require 10,000 lines of code and 27
> active processes to tell me that I have a SATA disk drive attached.
>
> You want systemd and that's fine.  But I, and many others, do not want
> it and do not need your supportive arguments.  That's why a fork is
> the most sensible solution.  Then there will be no conflict between
> sysadmins and those interested in personal productivity.
>

My machine boots in five seconds.  What is the issue? System D is 
totally invisible to this productivity user.

I sense a tempest in a teapot.

-- 
Garry  AKA  --Phoenix--  Rising above the Flames.

I have as much authority as the Pope, I just don't have as many people who believe it.
Star Trek mort. Viva la Star Trek admiraetur
The Olde Phoenix Inn http://phoenixinn.iwarp.com
Metro Detroit Linux Users Group http://www.mdlug.org