[mdlug] Looking for IPv6 presenter for LUGWASH
Kevin O'Brien
zwilnik2 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 22 21:08:20 EST 2012
Well, the first open date I am trying to fill is April 19. IF that works
for anyone, that would be great. But if a later month is better, we can do
that as well. Our meetings are always on the 3rd Thursday of the month.
Thanks,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Jay Nugent <jjn at nuge.com> wrote:
> > Greets,
> > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Michael Mol wrote:
> >
> >>> I think you mean "static" IP address.
> >>
> >>
> >> No, I mean public IPv4 address. As in, publicly routeable. I'm on
> >> Comcast residential, so DHCP, but I have a publicly routable IPv4
> >> address (71.205.113.62, at the moment). It just changes every few
> >> weeks.
> >
> >
> > Yes, exactly. STATIC publicly routable, non-RFC1918 address. A.k.a.
> > 'static'. As opposed to a 'dynamic' publicly routable non-RFC1918
> address
> > that changes every few weeks.
>
> So we've established that we're talking about non-RFC1918,
> publicly-routable IPv4 addresses. My original point was that Hurricane
> Electric's 6in4 tunnels require public IPv4 addresses. That remains
> true.
>
> It is irrelevant whether the IPv4 addresses are static or dynamic,
> except to the point where you may have downtime on the tunnel if your
> IPv4 lease renewal is refused, you get bumped to a different lease,
> and the configuration of your tunnel hasn't been updated on their
> tserv. (Curiously, on my connection, I tend to be flipped between
> different subnets when the IP changes. I wonder if that's related to
> network maintenance or some such.)
>
> > I currently have TWO /25 blocks from my ISP
> > (216.144.208/25 and 63.215.167/25). I *can* live with a lot less so I am
> > hoping to negotiate with the new ISP for a block of 32 addrs.
>
> Wow...nice. :) My employer gets a big whopping /29. One's usable IPv4
> address space gets kinda narrow down here.
>
> > And just because your address is served up via DHCP doesn't mean that
> it
> > cannot be 'static' (never changing). We did that all the time with each
> of
> > the ISP's that I have done consulting work for (half dozen or so of
> them, so
> > far).
>
> Certainly having your IP served up via DHCP doesn't mean it can't be
> static. It doesn't force the issue one way or another.
>
> >> My understanding of ADSL is that non-primary* ADSL providers have
> >> their traffic routed through the primary's network on a tagged vlan,
> >> until it comes out at the ISP's POP. IIRC, I did find an ADSL provider
> >> in Seattle which could give me (in Grand Rapids) native IPv6, but my
> >> packets would be bouncing across the country.
> >
> >
> > Coolness!
>
> Cool in that there's an ADSL provider that'd do it! Not so cool for
> the latency factor or the amount of AT&T equipment the packets would
> have to cover. It's my understanding AT&T's DSL routing architecture
> is so overdue for incremental upgrades and layout refactoring, they're
> to the stage where it'd be cheaper to replace the whole thing. And
> they committed that money bidding on T-Mobile. So I went to Comcast.
>
> I wish more ADSL ISPs would set themselves up to provide IPv6, though.
> I think 6rd is fine for a *very* short-term solution, but it'd annoy
> the heck out of me. Having my IPv6 address space renumber every time
> my IPv4 address changed would be maddening, and I don't want to pay
> for business class on a residential connection.
>
> >> * Don't know the exact term, sorry. Primary being the physical owner,
> >> non-primary being the ones who lease.
> >
> >
> > In brief, for those on the list whom have ever wondered:
> >
> > The DSL signal is carried over the copper pair to the telephone Central
> > Office where it is atteched to a specific physical port on a DSLAM. The
> > DSLAM *may* belong to the Telco, or it *may* belong to a provider. But
> > typically the Telco owns them and leases space. ISP's subscribe to lease
> > space on several DSLAMS in different Central Offices (CO) within a LATA
> or
> > across a specific geographic region. Some ISP's only support a small
> number
> > of CO's, others lease DSLAM space across the entire state or country.
> >
> > The DSLAM is configured to pass your traffic using L2TP (layer 2
> Transport
> > Layer) packets across an ATM (Asynchronous Transport) "cloud". THE DSLAM
> > config states that your physical 'port' belongs to 'X' ISP, what the
> maximum
> > allowed speed will be (1.5 down by 768k up), and routes the packets
> > accordingly. Each ISP (TelnetWW, Provide.net, DigitalRealm.com, WWnet,
> > AT&T, etc.) subscribe to a connection off of this ATM cloud to collect
> the
> > traffic from their subscribers.
> >
> > The L2TP packets come accross the ATM cloud into the ISP's
> "concentrator"
> > (typically a large Cisco router) where the connection is then
> authenticated
> > using RADIUS. The RADIUS config tells the concentrator where these
> packets
> > may flow (to private VPN, like AOL) or should they be allowed to reach
> the
> > public Internet. RADIUS also defines if the customer is 'dynamic' or
> > 'static', and how large that static block of addresses is supposed to be.
> >
> >
> > Well, that's it in a nutshell. There are many more details involved,
> but
> > this gives a general idea how the process works.
> >
> > Enjoy!
>
> That's a very excellent explanation, thanks!
>
> --
> :wq
> _______________________________________________
> mdlug mailing list
> mdlug at mdlug.org
> http://mdlug.org/mailman/listinfo/mdlug
>
--
Kevin B. O'Brien
zwilnik2 at gmail.com
Facebook is Evil. Cancel your account.
More information about the mdlug
mailing list