[mdlug] linux usuability (rant)

[Aaron Kulkis]

Dean Durant wrote:
> So first I have to acknowledge, when you're talking about free software, you can never complain.   
> 
> <rant>
> 
> Somehow, at my company, they have managed to defy the beast and they are actually using linux for CAE workstations.    And it works great.   But I would like to run webmail for lotus notes, which requires a functioning java plug-in for firefox.   And I would like to run openoffice.    Now these are 64-bit x86_64 systems, running RHEL for x86_84.    (is RHEL the problem?)
> 

Install the 32-bit seamonkey and/or firefox, and all will be well.

This is the simplest solution until such time that 64-bit plugins are
available for flash, etc.


> They run the CAE apps just fine.   But the CAE manager is a windows bigot and an idiot.

Now you're being redundant ;-)

 >
    They don't have the money for citrix, and their is kind of a war 
between my manager, and all the bosses in CAE land, to where they have 
to pay for extra boxes.   Meaning, a separate windows box for lotus 
notes, and powerpoint, and all that crap.
> 
> What kills me is, and I know I shouldn't compain, but things like java for firefox on 64 bit linux are apparently not automatic.   And openoffice 2.3 isn't working either.   So, it makes linux look bad, and it makes me look bad too.   Me being a linux advocate.   Because, there's never an issue with office (or openoffice) for windows, and java doesn't seem to be an issue either, and of course, for lotus notes 6.5, there is a full-blown client for windows, but not for linux.    (no, we're not upgrading to a new version of notes anytime soon.)
> 

I'm running 32-bit seamonkey on my AMD64_x2 and everything works great.

> So, sorry for the rant.    Just frustrating I guess.   These workstations are in production.  I could export the display and work from my laptop, but even enabling remote X on linux seems to be a exercise in a lot of setup, as I recall.
> 
> </rant>