[mdlug] SCO is baack.....

[Aaron Kulkis]

Rich Clark <rrclark at rrclark.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, R. Kannan wrote:
> 
>> I thought SCO was put away for good but they seem to find someone to keep funding their sinking business...
>>
>> http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3728201/SCO+Plans+Rebound+Thanks+to+100M+Lifeline.htm
> 
> Read carefully PJ's assessment of the deal and its ties to Gates and 
> Microsoft through SCNP and its Saudi financier and also note webster's (a 
> retired lawyer who follows groklaw like a saint) comments regarding his 
> take on the deal. It may fly; it's been tailored to do so, but it can 
> still be headed off or slowed down by sufficient objection from the 
> parties in interest, i.e., Novell, IBM, Red Hat, etc. I'm not at all 
> surprised, though.
> 

What's truly sad is that there should even be a need for a site
like groklaw to exist.

(Note: I'm not complaining about the existance of groklaw..I'm
all for it!  I'm lamenting the need for it.)