[mdlug] Drive Assignment Changed when Reinserted into Server

[gib at juno.com]

MUG.org had a presentation on that not to far back.  I got it on video I think.  Check my channel.

---------- Original Message ----------
From: Michael Mol <mikemol at gmail.com>
To: awilliam at whitemice.org, "MDLUG's Main discussion list" <mdlug at mdlug.org>
Subject: Re: [mdlug] Drive Assignment Changed when Reinserted into Server
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:31:50 -0400

On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
<awilliam at whitemice.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 10:38 -0400, Robert Adkins II wrote:
>> Thanks for the extra information.
>> I want to eliminate potential issues before they become issues.
>> I'll review blkid and also LVM.
>
> If you can switch to LVM *TODAY*.  It is *THE* solution, everything else
> is a work-around.
>
> But at least use UUIDs for identifying drives rather then device names.
> There is no real reason to every use device names on modern systems.
>
>> Still aiming for the goal of a good clean HD based backup system.
>
> LVM provides snapshots AND the ability to migrate logical volumes and
> portions of logical volumes between physcial volumes.  Very hand for
> doing upgrades in hot-swap enclosures.

+1 on LVM.

My preferred configuration puts LVM on top of RAID; a single RAID
array becomes a single LVM PV and VG.

btrfs is getting close, for me, but I'm not going to take the plunge
for a while yet. ZFS on FreeNAS is nice in the one context I've used
it...but I haven't read through any literature for good practices and
error recovery for btrfs/zfs-style setups.


-- 
:wq
_______________________________________________
mdlug mailing list
mdlug at mdlug.org
http://mdlug.org/mailman/listinfo/mdlug


____________________________________________________________
53 Year Old Mom Looks 33
The Stunning Results of Her Wrinkle Trick Has Botox Doctors Worried
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/4ff24e0949a14e0879f0st52vuc