[mdlug] Compression and Archiving
Michael Mikowski
z_mikowski at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 11 01:27:27 EST 2010
At present pricing, I'd vote to buy a 1TB HD. Recovery, access, and reliability would be much better, IMO.
Cheers, Mike
----- Original Message ----
From: Drew <drew4096 at gmail.com>
To: MDLUG's Main discussion list <mdlug at mdlug.org>
Sent: Mon, January 11, 2010 2:11:27 AM
Subject: [mdlug] Compression and Archiving
I find myself with a lot of data to archive and back up - 120 GB of
it, with possibly more to come at a
later date - and am considering DVDs and squashfs. Current DVD cost
weighs in at 18 cents a disk
(Office Max), which is under 4 cents a gigabyte, which is less than
half the cost of current terabyte
range hard drives as far as I know.
Still, before committing resources to this I thought it a good idea
to consult the list on a couple of things.
Squashfs seems to give me compression down to from 66% to 77% of
original size with most of the
files being PDFs. I had been hoping for something a bit better. Is
there a way to specify better compression
methods? Is there a better filesystem to use? Or would I be better
off using something like gzip or bz2?
I'd like to be able to mount these as loop devices.
Also, can an entire DVD be a squashfs filesystem? Or does it have to
be wrapped in an iso?
----
- Drew.
_______________________________________________
mdlug mailing list
mdlug at mdlug.org
http://mdlug.org/mailman/listinfo/mdlug
More information about the mdlug
mailing list