[mdlug] Damaged Image recovery

[Aaron Kulkis]

Robert Citek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Aaron Kulkis <akulkis00 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dan Pritts wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 12:03:28PM -0700, Michael Mikowski wrote:
>>>> And SATA RAID almost certainly beats the pants off USB drives for performance and reliability :)
>>> sata storage of any sort almost certainly beats the pants off USB
>>> drives for just about anything except perhaps cost.
>> Or you just buy a SATA drive, and put it in a $35 USB
>> enclosure...then SATA marginally beats a USB drive.
> 
> Or get an eSATA enclosure, which tend to have USB2 also:
> 
> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/category/category_slc.asp?CatId=2780
> 
> Speed, portability, ubiquity, and capacity at a reasonable price.
> 

I think USB connections are more ubiquitious than eSATA.
You won't find eSATA on 5-year old motherboards.