[mdlug] MS patents OS crippling

[Raymond McLaughlin]

R. Kannan wrote:
> In case you haven't seen this, MS has patented the tools for extortion:
> 
> "On Tuesday, Microsoft was granted US Patent No. 7,536,726 (it was filed in 2005) for intentionally crippling the functionality of an operating system by 'making selected portions and functionality of the operating system unavailable to the user or by limiting the user's ability to add software applications or device drivers to the computer' until an 'agreed upon sum of money' is paid to 'unlock or otherwise make available the restricted functionality.' According to Microsoft, this solves a 'problem inherent in open architecture systems,' i.e., 'they are generally licensed with complete use rights and/or functionality that may be beyond the need or desire of the system purchaser.' An additional problem with open architecture systems, Microsoft explains, is that 'virtually anyone can write an application that can be executed on the system.' Nice to see the USPTO rewarding Microsoft's eight problem-solving inventors, including Linux killer (and antelope killer) Joachim Kempin
, 
>  who's been credited with getting Microsoft hauled into federal court on antitrust charges."
> 
> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,536,726.PN.&OS=PN/7,536,726&RS=PN/7,536,726
> 

And, I think, prior art is trivial to find. A couple of weeks ago I got
some limited experience with DEC's TRU64 UNIX. My research lead me to
references indicating that system functionality depended on certain
license files (PAK files if I recall) being present and up to date.