[mdlug-discuss] NAT != security, right?

[Aaron Kulkis]

Durant, Dean wrote:
> Hello, in the “should we go to IPv6” debate, ordinary people, when you 
> tell them, everything will be connectable, ask, well, what about security?
> 
>  
> 
> Then the NAT lovers come along and say, see, there’s a good reason to 
> have NAT.
> 
>  
> 
> Thoughts?

...and my screen door not only protects my valuables
from thieves, but is also a fire-prevention mechanism.