[mdlug-discuss] NAT != security, right?

[Garry Stahl]

Durant, Dean wrote:
>
> Hello, in the “should we go to IPv6” debate, ordinary people, when you
> tell them, everything will be connectable, ask, well, what about security?
>
> Then the NAT lovers come along and say, see, there’s a good reason to
> have NAT.
>
> Thoughts?
>

Is IPv6 any less secure than IPv4?

-- 
Garry  AKA  --Phoenix--  Rising above the Flames.

Those persons, or societies, easily offended need to be offended until they get over it.
Star Trek mort. Viva la Star Trek admiraetur
The Olde Phoenix Inn http://phoenixinn.iwarp.com
Metro Detroit Linux Users Group http://www.mdlug.org