[mdlug-discuss] [mdlug] OT was: Re: Open source MySQL - MySQL Creator: Oracleto Purchase Sun which Owns M ySQL

[Aaron Kulkis]

Robert Adkins II wrote:
>  
> From: Aaron Kulkis <akulkis00 at gmail.com>
>>>> ps. Per the the female rant: A lot of American women demand men
>>> provide for
>>>> them, then cook and clean when they get home from their 10-12 hour
>>> day.  What
>>>> the men earn is "theirs" and what she earns is "hers."  
>> And then the
>>> women
>>>> don't respect the men because they are not "strong" enough.
>>>  And a whole lot of men don't let their wives out of the 
>> house to see 
>>> anyone else, even their family. And don't let them work while not 
>>> allowing them any money. And beat them to ensure 
>> compliance. Etc. etc.
>> 1. Yes, hundreds of millions.
>> Actually, very few in this country and most all of them of 
>> Islamic beliefs.
>>
> 
> 	Please provide a source where you received this information.

Spend some time in the Mideast.

> Mysogyny isn't something new or "mostly" in the Islamic world. There's more
> than ample examples of this taking place within all nations regardless of
> religious makeup. I'd like to know where you obtained the information that
> this is "most all of them" are muslim.

Are you even the slightly aware of the culture war going on in
which the Islamic radicals are literally DESTROYING girl's schools,
and beating any woman who appears in public without a male family
member escorting them?

What rock have you been hiding under?

Even during Desert Storm, the Saudis were shitting bricks because
we had female personnel DRIVING VEHICLES.

> 
>> 2. Generally, when someone makes accusations with no actual 
>> evidence that the person or people accused are doing any such 
>> thing, it's indicative of the skeletons in their OWN closet.
>> [See: "Projection"]
>>
> 
> 	Curious, didn't you just accuse Muslims of something without posting
> actual evidence?


Ray Ingles implied that it's a widespread phenomenon.
In the US culture, that's nowhere close to true.

> 
>> 3.  What does ANY of that have to do with a) current women's 
>> attitudes towards perfectly decent men, b) divorce laws which 
>> allow a woman to both cheat on her husband AND THEN add to 
>> the insult by walking out with half of his stuff and the kids and
>> c) the family co^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hstarchamber system which 
>> perpetuates this chicanery.
>>
> 
> 	Is this a sign of the sort of skeletons to which you spoke of
> previously?

I've seen what has happened to all too many friends and coworkers.
The most egregious example being the wife of a manager at Olde
Discount (the stock trading firm).  She started going out with
her friends for "girls night out"... pretty soon she was dragging
in HOURS after the bars closed.

And then she divorced him, and took him to the cleaners.

SHE's the one who was committing adultery, and the courts paid
her off for doing so.  Tony, not having a suspicious bone in his
body, had the rug pulled out from under him, to say the least.

But he's far from the only one.

Which is why so many female columnists, in both magazines and
newspapers are whining that men are "afraid of commitment"
rather than acknowledging the fact that, under the current
legal climate, a man is rightfully suspicious of making a commitment
to someone who has no obligation to be equally committed to him,
and will be REWARDED for betraying his trust.

> 
>> 4) how did the old "fault-needed" divorce system NOT serve 
>> women who were the victims of physical abuse and unlawful 
>> imprisonment?
>>
>> Methings you've been watching too much of the Lifetime Channel
>> (motto: "Rape Fantasy" movies direct to your home!)
>>
> 
> 	You are painting quite a picture of your point of view regarding
> women and it's not really a very positive image.

Do you have a more accurate description of the Lifetime channel?